THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN FLUID BALANCE AND FLUID MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES WITH MORTALITY AND CLINICAL OUTCOMES IN ICU: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW

Arda Tri Wahyuningsih

doi:10.64531/deqr0867

Authors

Arda Tri Wahyuningsih Universitas Sriwijaya Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.64531/deqr0867

Keywords:

Fluid balance, mortality, clinical outcome, critical illness, Intensive Care Unit

Abstract

Background : Fluid balance is one of the fundamental management aspects in critically ill patients treated in the intensive care unit (ICU). Fluid resuscitation is necessary to maintain tissue perfusion and increase cardiac output. However, excessive fluid accumulation can cause adverse effects. Several studies have shown that positive cumulative fluid balance in the early stages of ICU admission can worsen outcomes in critically ill patients and is associated with high mortality.

Methods : A literature search was conducted in the PubMed, ScienceDirect, and SpringeLink databases. Of the 834 articles, five systematic reviews and meta-analyses that assessed the relationship between fluid balance and fluid management strategies with mortality and clinical outcomes in ICU patients in the last five years and met the established inclusion and exclusion criteria were analyzed in this systematic review.

Result : Based on the search results, five systematic reviews and meta-analyses were found that were relevant to the research objective, namely the relationship between fluid balance and fluid management strategies with mortality and clinical outcomes in ICU patients. Two observational meta-analyses reported that fluid overload and positive cumulative fluid balance in the early ICU phase were consistently associated with increased short- and long-term mortality, as well as organ complications including acute kidney injury (AKI), the need for renal replacement therapy (RRT), and worsening respiratory function. Conversely, three RCT meta-analyses showed that restrictive fluid resuscitation strategies did not significantly reduce mortality but were safe to use and provided secondary benefits in the form of reduced mechanical ventilation duration.

Conclusion : Fluid overload after the resuscitation phase in the ICU is consistently associated with increased mortality and organ complications. Meanwhile, restrictive fluid strategies in clinical trials do not reduce mortality but are safe and beneficial for secondary outcomes such as mechanical ventilation duration. An individualized and phase-based fluid approach, in line with the ROSE concept, is needed to prevent fluid overload and improve outcomes in critically ill patients.

References

1. Wang TJ, Pai KC, Huang C Te, Wong LT, Wang MS, Lai CM, et al. A Positive Fluid Balance in the First Week Was Associated With Increased Long-Term Mortality in Critically Ill Patients: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Front Med (Lausanne). 2022;9:727103.

2. Hayashi Y, Shimazui T, Tomita K, Shimada T, Miura RE, Nakada T aki. Associations Between Fluid Overload and Outcomes in Critically Ill Patients with Acute Kidney Injury: A Retrospective observational study. Sci Rep. 2023 Dec;13:17410.

3. Pfortmueller CA, Dabrowski W, Wise R, van Regenmortel N, Malbrain MLNG. Fluid Accumulation Syndrome in Sepsis and Septic Shock: Pathophysiology, Relevance and Treatment—A Comprehensive Review. Ann Intensive Care. 2024 Dec;14(115).

4. Messmer AS, Zingg C, Müller M, Gerber JL, Schefold JC, Pfortmueller CA. Fluid Overload and Mortality in Adult Critical Care Patients-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies∗. Crit Care Med. 2020 Dec 1;48(12):1862–70.

5. Lubis AP, Govardi E, Khairani M, Shailla T, Akbar HZ. Positive Fluid Overload Is Associated with Worse Clinical Outcomes in Critically Ill Patients: An Updated Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies. J Cell Mol Anesth. 2025;10(2):e148524.

6. Reynolds PM, Stefanos S, MacLaren R. Restrictive resuscitation in patients with sepsis and mortality: A systematic review and meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis. Pharmacotherapy. 2023 Feb 1;43(2):104–14.

7. Duan Y, Yin Y, Yue J, Zhu W, Yang X, Ma Y, et al. Is restriction of intravenous fluid beneficial for septic shock in ICU patients? A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. BMC Anesthesiol. 2025 Dec 1;25(374).

8. Shahnoor H, Divi R, Addi Palle LR, Sharma A, Contractor B, Krupanagaram S, et al. The Effects of Restrictive Fluid Resuscitation on the Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Sepsis or Septic Shock: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized-Controlled Trials. Cureus. 2023;15(9):e45620.

9. Messmer AS, Zingg C, Müller M, Gerber JL, Schefold JC, Pfortmueller CA. Fluid Overload and Mortality in Adult Critical Care Patients-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies. Crit Care Med. 2020;48(12):1862–70.

10. Alharbi RA, Aldardeer NF, Heaphy ELG, Alabbasi AH, Albuqami AM, Hawa H. Percent Fluid Overload for Prediction of Fluid De-escalation in Critically Ill Patients in Saudi Arabia: A Prospective Observational Study. Acute and Critical Care. 2023;38(2):209–16.

11. Meyhoff TS, Wichmann S, Messmer AS. Editorial: Fluid Overload in The Critically Ill. Frontiers Medicine. 2023;10.

12. Agustina AY, Wisudarti alcarina FR, Widodo U. Fluid Management for Critically Ill Patients, Based on the ROSE Concept, an Old Method but Effective Enough. Journal of Anaesthesia and Pain [Internet]. 2023;5(1):8–14. Available from: https://jap.ub.ac.id/index.php/jap/article/view/15299

13. Malbrain MLNG, Langer T, Annane D, Gattinoni L, Elbers P, Hahn RG, et al. Intravenous fluid therapy in the perioperative and critical care setting: Executive summary of the International Fluid Academy (IFA). Ann Intensive Care. 2020;10(64).